The content on this page is retained only for recordkeeping, historical reference, or research. These materials are preserved in their original form and may not meet current WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards.

These archived materials are not required to be remediated. However, we remain committed to equitable access. If you need an accessible version of any archived item to participate in our current programs and services, we will provide one when feasible upon request at caesweb@uga.edu.

One of the comments I get about climate modeling from people who don’t know much about them is how can we predict the climate 100 years from now when we can’t even get the weather right two weeks from now. Really, climate and weather models are built quite differently and while there are some similarities, it is like comparing a Ferrari to a Ford F250. They both have four wheels and an engine, but they are built to do different things. A Ferrari is built to look good and go fast, like a weather model, which has to get the details right and do it quickly. A climate model is more like a Ford, built to go for a long time and haul heavy loads. Some people might say they look good too, but not in quite the same way as the sports car. Here is an article which provides more details about the differences from the University of Arizona at https://www.climas.arizona.edu/blog/climate-models-versus-weather-models-different-approaches-different-needs.

Source: NOAA
Posted in: