{"id":692,"date":"2020-03-26T10:00:48","date_gmt":"2020-03-26T14:00:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/?p=692"},"modified":"2020-03-26T10:00:49","modified_gmt":"2020-03-26T14:00:49","slug":"cook-extension-ag-updates-3-26-20","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/2020\/03\/cook-extension-ag-updates-3-26-20\/","title":{"rendered":"Cook Extension Ag Updates 3\/26\/20"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong> Season-long Disease and Nematode Control <\/strong> &#8211; Dr. Bob Kemerait: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Planting season is upon us and critical decisions with regards to season-long disease and nematode control must be made before the furrow is closed.\u00a0  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>\u00a0Nematode management for corn producers.\u00a0 Options are Telone II, Counter 20G, Propulse, and Avicta Complete Corn (a seed treatment).\u00a0 <\/li><li>Peanut      seed issues- I spoke with Dr. Tim Brenneman this morning and he continues      to analyze results from work he has done on addressing our seed-quality      issues.\u00a0 In a &#8220;nut shell&#8221;- A)\u00a0 Fungicide seed      treatments are a MUST on peanut seed.\u00a0 B ) Where high quality seed is      planted, use of Rancona or Dynasty PD is likely sufficient.\u00a0 C)\u00a0      Where seed quality is an issue, or MAY be an issue, Rancona has been a      much better product for suppressing Aseprgillus flavus and, to some      degree, Aspergillus niger, on the seed.\u00a0 D)\u00a0 Where Dynasty PD is      used on seed and where seed-quality is an issue, use of either Proline or      Velum Total in-furrow is recommended (as opposed to      azoxystronin\/Abound).\u00a0 E) Where Rancona is used and there is question      on seed quality, growers may use Proline, Velum Total or Abound, as Abound      and Rancona contain different chemistries.\u00a0 F)\u00a0 If growers are      using Velum Total in-furrow already for nematode control, they do not need      to add additional Abound in-furrow for extra protection against seedling      diseases.\u00a0 G)\u00a0 If your grower wants Rancona and cannot get it,      BEWARE of &#8220;offers&#8221; that come for products that are &#8220;just as      good&#8221;.\u00a0 To date, we at UGA are talking about Dynasty PD,      Rancona, Proline, Velum Total, and azoxystrobin (Abound).\u00a0 <\/li><li>Cotton      nematodes- warm soils and cotton left in the field that never died add up      to greater risk for nematodes in 2020<\/li><li>Kudzu and      Asian soybean rust- we know that kudzu survived the winter and is infected      with Asian soybean rust.\u00a0 It is very possible that we will have      earlier outbreaks of soybean rust in 2020.\u00a0 Soybean producers should      be anticipating this.&#8221;<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Clarification on Phosphite Materials<\/strong> (for Pecans) &#8211; Dr. Lenny Wells<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on conversations I have had with a number of growers it sounds \nas if there is a need for some clarification regarding phosphite \nmaterials. Phosphite has become a very valuable tool for us in the \nbattle against pecan scab. Dr. Tim Brenneman first began testing \nphosphite materials on pecan primarily for efficacy on some of our minor\n foliar diseases like anthracnose a number of years ago (since at least \n2009). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the course of Dr. Brenneman\u2019s research he began to notice that \nphosphite also had a significant effect on scab\u2014especially leaf scab. As\n his research continued, he developed a large data set on phosphite over\n several years, using many different phosphite products. UGA Extension \nrecommendations for phosphite use are based <strong><em>solely<\/em><\/strong>\n on Dr. Brenneman\u2019s research. Initially it was only recommended for use \nin combination with other products, never as a stand-alone. Dr. \nBrenneman now has the data to show that at rates of at least 2 qts per \nacre, phosphite can be used alone for leaf scab during the \npre-pollination stage. It is an excellent leaf scab material and this is\n where its best use lies. It can be used during nut sizing as well but \nin high scab pressure situations, should be tank mixed with another \nfungicide for nut scab.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now, what exactly is phosphite? Phosphite (H3 PO3 ) is derived from <strong>Phosphorous acid<\/strong>, NOT <strong>Phosphoric acid<\/strong>\n (H3PO4) which is a fertilizer.   Phosphorous acid dissociates to form \nthe phosphonate ion (HPO3 2-), also called phosphite.   Phosphites are \nhighly systemic and very stable in plants.  There is evidence that \nphosphite may stimulate host defenses .  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Phosphite or Phosphorous acid <em><strong>is not converted into phosphate, which is the primary nutrient source of P for plant <\/strong><\/em>.    There are bacteria capable of transforming phosphite into phosphate,  but this process is so slow that it is of no practical relevance. To  date, no plant enzymes are known to convert phosphite into phosphate.  Therefore, any claims that phosphite can contribute to P nutrient  requirements for plant growth should be taken with much caution. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As a matter of fact, phosphite can trick plants into thinking they \nhave enough P, which may potentially contribute to P deficiency when \nphosphite is over-used (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1081\/PLN-100106017?casa_token=cCEd_m3Q6-oAAAAA%3AbIsRRkmcn2qcg_CZNxFstH7eCqj50ovc7659HZL0M6mE6A1lJjCgFpcrDKTLOwIRBemxJITUBAtg\">see the article linked here for more info on this topic)<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is apparently some concern out there about the salts present in\n many phosphite products. If purity of product is of specific concern to\n you, then you should use a phosphite product that does not have salts \npresent (bear in mind, that your soil applied potash [KCl] is also a \nchloride containing salt). <strong><em>However, Dr. Brenneman\u2019s research\n has shown no negative effect from phosphite products containing salt in\n his research going back at least 10-11 years.<\/em><\/strong> There is no evidence for greater toxicity risk in phosphite products containing salt than for those without salt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you are concerned about the long term effects of products \ncontaining salt, you may also want to consider the fact that phosphite \nitself is not metabolized by the plant and we also do not know what the \nlong-term ramifications of that may be. Let me be clear, we do not have \nany evidence that would lead us to believe this will cause any \ndetrimental effects to pecan trees. Nor do we have any evidence to \nsuggest the salts present in some phosphite products will cause any \ndetrimental effects. If independent research on either topic leads to \nmore information on this, we will let you know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In short, Dr. Brenneman\u2019s research trials have shown that <strong><em>as far as efficacy is concerned, all the phosphite products Dr. Brenneman has tested (<\/em><\/strong>which include most of those we currently use in pecan\u2014I won\u2019t list them because there are too many to be named) <strong><em>work equally well on pecan scab<\/em><\/strong> and the other minor diseases from which phosphite provides protection <strong><em>and there is no more risk of toxicity with one phosphite product than there is with another. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <strong>Farm Recovery Block Grants  Info<\/strong> &#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/agr.georgia.gov\/farm-recovery.aspx\">HERE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Season-long Disease and Nematode Control &#8211; Dr. Bob Kemerait: &#8220;Planting season is upon us and critical decisions with regards to season-long disease and nematode control must be made before the furrow is closed.\u00a0 \u00a0Nematode management for corn producers.\u00a0 Options are Telone II, Counter 20G, Propulse, and Avicta Complete Corn (a seed treatment).\u00a0 Peanut seed issues- [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-692","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=692"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":693,"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692\/revisions\/693"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=692"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=692"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/site.extension.uga.edu\/cook\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=692"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}